Steven Jentzen and Livingston County Michigan Courts

Mr. Steven Jentzen sent in the mail a notice for a Motion To Withdraw he put into Court on April 3, 2009 ( I think the date is Mr. Skousens birthday). The hearing is scheduled for April 23, 2009 before Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola.

Mr. Steven Jentzen sent his e-mail on March 9,2009 notifying he withdrew on March 7, 2009 from the case. I was forced into the March 20, 2009 FOC hearing without an attorney, because Mr. Jentzen had not ‘officially withdrawn’

The withdrawal sent to me by Mr. Steven Jentzen read as follows: The withdrawal Mr. Steven Jentzen wrote up himself:

STATE OF MICHIGAN

IN THE FAMILY COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON


DEBORAH ,
Case No. -DM
Plaintiff,
Judge: Carol Hackettt Garagiola
V Referee: Gerald A. Eidt

SAMUEL J. SKOUSEN,

Defendant.
___________________________________/

STEVEN M. JENTZEN, P.C.
Steven M. Jentzen P29391
Attorney for Plaintiff
106 South Washington Street
Ypsilanti , MI 48197
(734) 482-5466
(734) 482-2440 Fax
__________________________________/

CONSENT ORDER TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF, DEBORAH

At a session of said Court,
City of Howell , Livingston County , Michigan ,
this _____ day of March, 2009.

PRESENT: HON____________________________ Circuit Court Judge

Plaintiff, Deborah , having stipulated hereto, and the court being duly advised in the premises; NOW THEREFORE,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Steven M. Jentzen, P.C., may withdraw as attorney of record for Plaintiff Deborah ., and that said withdrawal will be effective on the 7th day of March, 2009.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall retain other counsel who shall forthwith enter an appearance, or notify the court she intends to proceed in pro per, on or before March 14th, 2009.

Circuit Court Judge

Approved as to form and substance:

___________________________ _____________________________
Steven M. Jentzen P29392 Deborah, Plaintiff
Attorney for Plaintiff

I could not sign Mr. Steven Jentzen withdrawal, with his ‘further ordered’ put into his withdrawal -- I felt set up.
What Constitutional rights does Mr. Steven Jentzen believe in? Here four days lady to find and attorney, note a weekend is put into his “It is further Ordered”.

By March 19, 2009 I wrote to him stating

Dear Mr. Jentzen,

You are no longer my attorney and withdrew as of March 9, 2009. Your have not discussed my case with me, since my initial contact with you, you did not show up to a scheduled hearing in October 2008, or notify me of the hearing, and withdrew as of March 9, 2009 and you will not be paid. I cannot trust you to represent the interest of myself or family.

Sincerely,

Deborah
-----------------------
Another Withdrawal of Attorney form was returned to Mr. Steven Jentzen by me for Mr. Jentzen to sign, leaving off his "It is further order"; guess, he could not sign that one.

Mr. Steven Jentzen must not have understood he was 'fired' as of March 19, 2009.

on April 8. 2009 a second letter went out to Mr. Steven Jentzen which reads as follows:

Dear Mr Jentzen,

Your services have been terminated. You notified me on March 9, 2009 you were withdrawing from the case. As of the end of March your services were terminated. Your failed to sign the withdrawal form I sent to you, leaving out the stipulation I find an attorney within a few days time period for the FOC hearing, or go Pro Per......

Your failure to properly represent, failure to notify of the October hearing, a lack of attorney representation you are discharged. You have shown on conscience regarding your conduct.


Deborah

Next Hearing April 16, 2009

Judge Reader is hearing the disqualification Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola again, on April 16, 2009 at 8:30 a.m.. A notice was sent out yesterday on April 3, 2009, a day after I was before Judge Reader on Thursday, April 2,2009.

This is even after the notice of the actions in Appeals Court was put into record a awhile in Livingston County-- giving Livingston County Court two copies of the appeals.

Judge Reader was given another copy of the appeals on April 2, 2009 during the court hearing.

Hearing Before David Reader and a walk down the Hall with Neal Nielsen

Yesterday, April 2, 2009, there was a hearing before David Reader on a disqualification of Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola.

I have an appeals in the State of Michigan Appeals Court on an earlier decision of Judge Readers. The Appeals was entered into Livingston County court well over a week ago. Judge Reader was proceeding with the hearing, when I mentioned there was an appeals in. Reader stated it was not in the file, and I mentioned again, I had an appeals in.

I gave Judge Reader a copy of the Appeals.

Strange court file, not having the information in the file, especially since a copy was entered into Livingston County Court record. Wonder where it went?

I mentioned to the Judge I had given Livingston County Courts two copies of the appeals, paid a $25.00, and received a receipt, the receipt was at home.

Glad I had a copy of the appeals with me.

On my way into court for the 8:30 a.m. hearing, Neal Nielsen entered the court and cleared security before I entered. Nielson went into the clerks office; I noted on my way in, he was looking out the door of the clerks office. By the time I cleared security, picked up my purse, and started down the hallway, Nielson was at my side. He had taken a few quick steps to catch up, and proceeded to stay right next to me down the hallway.

Most people don't intrude on others personal space, when there is no intention of an conversation; they stay slightly behind, or pace themselves ahead

On about me: it tells of a day in the FOC, when: being in front of FOC referee Gerald Eidt, who clearly stated he does not read items in a case he is presiding over – this may be why Mr. Eidt named a former attorney, of Mr. Skousen’s, Neal Nielsen as receiver of our home; Mr. Skousen giggled as he lowered his head. After my objection, he proceeded to name other attorneys associated with Mr. Skousen.

"On November 14, 2001, the Commission filed an application for an order to enforce investigative subpoenas served on Neal D. Nielsen and Scott Nielsen, his son. The subpoenas sought documents and testimony from both individuals relating to false and misleading messages about publicly traded companies posted on Internet investor websites. Neal D. Nielsen and Scott Nielsen have not complied with the subpoenas issued by the Commission. A hearing on the Commission's application has not yet been scheduled."
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr17232.htm
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5251/is_200112/ai_n20108724/

There are many concerns on the conduct which has gone on for years in our courts and legal system.

(c) copyright 2009 all rights reserved