Janice Eudis Nielsen Skousen, Samuel J. Skousen and the Nielsen family

Below is a portion of a letter given to Janice Skousen on July 28, 2006:

Dear Janice Nielsen Skousen,

"In a phone call conversation earlier this month with Mr. Skousen, he stated you and Mr. Skousen wanted individuals belonging to your extended friendship group and family members of your ex husbands family, to enter into my home for the purpose of viewing he house at (address of home ). It was expressed in the form of a demand, and it was stated you would obtain a court order to do so, if I refused or questioned, the entry of your friends and family members of your former husband whom you are close with, the Nielsen family, from entering my home.

The home has not been brought up to standard, or properly repaired, as I had put into the court orders years ago, and further damaged by Mr. Skousen, as well as normal maintenance required to maintain a home needs to be done. It was also stated by Mr. Skousen that you would refuse to repair the home and wanted your family and friends to view my home for the purchase of my un repaired home.

This letter is to inform you, you have knowingly involved yourself in illegal criminal activity for the purpose of defrauding, self enrichment, enrichment of friends and family as well as in illegal cover up of wrongful activity,......"
___________

Mr. Samuel Jan Skousen and Janice Nielsen Skousen also had a bank account in my name going to their home for almost five yeas, without my knowledge or permission, which Janice and Mr. Skousen used for bank deposits, withdrawals and transferring large sums of money in and out.

Some religious people they are.

another letter will be added to the blog.

July 31, 2009 Samuel J. Skousen, Mental Health Dept. and Judge

The e-mail address Mr. Skousen has been contacting for months, is of an E Brown, Samuel J. Skousen, stating it is the e-mail address of the secretary of Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola; however the address is the e-mail address of the head of the Livingston County Mental Health Department, not Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola secretary. I was informed of this fact earlier this week in an e-mail from E. Brown. E Browns e-mail address and the e-mail Mr. Skousen sent me a copy of, is below in an earlier post.

It is unclear if this is an attempt by the Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola and Mr. Skousen to start a process to discredit, if so, the judge is assisting not only in a cover up, but a brutal method to discredit. This area isn't the old soviet union yet, where this type of tactic is and was used to discredit. Sadly, it would follow the Judges statement in court today of, "This doesn't make sense", "This doesn't make sense", as a man from a County Dept., computer open, typing away sat in the back of the near empty court room.

The motion made perfect sense, and documents the corruption and collusion within the county court system, relatives of Judges and Prosecutors involvement, as well as individuals involved in abuse and cover up.

and not the first time Mr. Skousen with the assistance of legal help has attempted to discredit. A former church member came to my home and relayed a conservation he had with Mr. Skousen were Mr. Skousen made the following statements an note was written up documenting the converstion:

The note dated 7/28/99 reads:

"I had worked on Sam Skousen's car, he told me he really wanted to get the children. Sam told me he and his attorney David Morris,( a Mormon church member) was going to try and make people believe Debbie was insane. Then they would have her committed, and he would get his custody ",--- the former member signed his name on a document, to the events of his conversation with Mr. Skousen.


for other reasons, why they abused Ms. Skousen and wanted her discredited; cut and paste:

Bizzy blog a Conservative, blogger, blog listed below:

The case against Mitt Romney his risky associations and entanglements

http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/07/22/the-case-against-mitt-romney-his-risky-associations-and-entanglements/

and blog: which gives more details to the risky associations found at link below to
Strange Bedfellows

http://janskousenandromney.blogspot.com

or go to the bottom of this blog and click on "Strange Bedfellow" under favorite blogs

Samuel J. Skousen and Jan Skousen a Letter

Mrs. Hamilton e-mailed and stated you gave her a check for 3,000.00 dollars today for the roof, money for the roof and Ms. Hamilton too. Well, Sam,-- Samuel J. Skousen, King of the Hill, remember? You must be very satisfied with yourself. You made with off with everything and destroyed what you could. She is your hammer, like you said.

Sad, you could have not done the roof awhile ago as promised, you didn't, and left everyone hanging. Hope Jan's family enjoys the home, hope you make all the money you wanted so badly to have to do what you, it must have been very important to you. Money. Hope you gamble in Los Vegas, as Jan's family is accustom to --

Some of your kids cannot get jobs, because you were too busy making yourself important,they couldn't get the MBA you got, couldn't get the BA. They struggle to support their family. You did a fine job, you and Jan have such a wonderful and exciting life. You're the Mormon husband she dreamed of, the other one was too gentile. All you can think about, is the money you will make, money taking......... Money you and Jan ran through a bank account with my name on it -- Judge didn't care about that either. Just doesn't care.

Who was that lady sitting next to you in the hallway, the very first time we were at the FOC? Never figured out why she was there, but as I looked at the Judge today, they looked strangely the same, a twin perhaps? Remember you were almost crowing, as if there was something I didn’t know. First, I thought it was your attorney, but then no, never quite figured it out....

Since you and Jan have refused to come assist in taking the large items in the basement, or even help to clean a mess you left -- as you have done over the past many years, I will be contacting other charity organizations in the surrounding area, asking for assistance, hopefully there are some kind people left. Mormons are too fine a people, to be bothered with a tiny thing like making sure your kids got educated, your family emotionally healthy, or taken care of.

Your shameful, both you and Jan, going to Priesthood Meeting, Jan doing her Relief Society work, both of you running around making yourselves look good, helping your fellow Mormons, ---- letting the very thing in your life you were to cherish and take care of, go to ruin. It is unforgivable, and a hypocrisy, your a mighty powerful man--- like you wanted to be.

Judge said Sue Hamilton could Evict

I wasn't a surprise today, Mr. Skousen had indicated the outcome a few weeks ago. Mr. Skousen told Ms. Hamilton he had money to pay her today, as we sat waiting for the judge this afternoon he told her he had several hundreds of dollars he could pay her, and could get more. He only mentioned the check for the roof, saying he had nothing more.

Deals have been done for decades in the legal system here.

The Judge said she didn't care if we were left homeless. Gary McCrire's wife was left living in a basement of her mothers home, after having his divorce heard before Judge Garagiola. She was left with nothing. There were allegations Gary was abusive and controlling, but his wife was ordered for psychological counseling.

My concern, we already had our home broken in, and there was an attempt to remove documents, some were removed. Now, the Judge is putting us in a position to have everything we have exposed to these criminals in the county. Do as told by the receiver or evict, the problem is the receiver can decide it at anytime, with or without cause. My largest objections to the receiver is, she misrepresented herself when she came to my home the first time, the second is she allowed me no funds to repair the inside of the home, and continually gave Mr. Skousen preferential treatment.

Remembering the campaign signs of Judge Garagiola and William McCririe which were place one on top of the other, no surprise she would rule harshly. I think I have read where their children were friends, in long ago article I read.

A call came in to my son while I was in court, which referred to home brakes-in occurring currently in our area. Which has put my son on edge. No doubt from someone in the county, by what was stated. They wanted their sign put up on our yard also. --- funny, funny.

The judge does not care if women are left homeless, doesn't care a crime was covered up, just doesn't care.

An earlier case today in her court, was the son of Neil Nielsen, it is a DM case, that means a domestic case. Nielsen, William McCririe, Steve Garagiola a Channel 4 News caster, wife Judge Garagiola, buds?

Nielsen had been in trouble several years back on a penny stock scam he ran. Not sure all the out come on the case.


The other call which came in said a long time debt was to be paid.

Guess, a deal is a deal, even if it is a crime.

I had wanted the home repaired so a loss would not incurred, wanted to make sure we would be safe as the home was being sold. I wanted Mr. Skousen to remove the junk he left, which is too large for me to handle. --- Oh, no not precious Mr. Skousen, Mr. Skousen clean up a mess he left --- absolutely not!

Mr. Skousen is going back to Korea, even though he stated he lost his job. Did he keep his apartment there?




88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

Hearing Before Carol Hackett Garagiola

STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LIVINGSTON COUNTY
44th CIRCUIT COURT FAMILY DIVISION
Deborah Hon. Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola

Vs.
Samuel J. Skousen
30979 Bramley Circle
New Hudson, Michigan 48163
248-437-8655
EVIDENTIARY HEARING BRIEF



The divorce order which was drawn up in 1998 is effectively a contract, a contract violated by Mr. Samuel J. Skousen with the aid of Richard Trost, to the detriment of Deborah and without Deborah consent, or knowledge. The reasoning behind Mr. Samuel J. Skousen’s and Richard Trost actions was to cover up a criminal act by an associate and friend of people in the Livingston County Michigan legal system. This was and is an impropriety on Richard Trost,Edwin Literski’s and Mr. Samuel J. Skousen’s part, some ten years ago, and part of an on going issue.

To revisit the Divorce Court Order in a detrimental manner to Deborah would be a violation of long standing principles of law. The divorce order cannot be revised in part, but may need to be reexamined in the whole to prevent further damages to Deborah, due to Mr. Samuel J. Skousen’s violations of the divorce agreement. Especially, since the party wanting changes, Samuel J. Skousen, is the individual which broke the agreement, when he failed to make repairs to the home, and made agreements not to sell the home in order to keep someone from criminal legal action.

Mr. Samuel J. Skousen’s, action before the court flies in the face of long standing legal principals established century’s ago, and flagrantly violated by Samuel J. Skousen and Richard Trost, emotionally and financially damaging Deborah for the past ten to eleven years.

The sale of the marital home was a key provision meant to insure Deborah could become established and what is going on, is Mr. Samuel J. Skousen continuing to batter, control and damage Deborah with the aid of the Livingston County Court system and the Friend of the Court by his current court action.

Not selling the home for ten years, has also been a financial benefit to Mr. Samuel J. Skousen, by having the home as tax write off, when Samuel J. Skousen’s salary substantially increased after the divorce, not having to pay alimony, as well as vastly decreasing the value of the home from the passing of ten years, which further damages Deborah. Mr. Samuel J. Skousen has waited for his current court action to a time he feels he can claim only his pension, and Mr. Samuel J. Skousen failing to mention his other ten plus business he has in his name, which Mr. Samuel J. Skousen has refused to account for. There are still large amounts of funds Mr. Samuel J. Skousen took to his business partners that are still unaccounted for, the court and attorneys aided Mr. Samuel J. Skousen in making sure the funds were not accounted for.

There is a attempt to shift the burden from those who violated the agreement namely, Richard Trost, Samuel J. Skousen, and Edwin Literski, and place the burden on to Deborah , to her financial and emotional determent.

The actions of the receiver, Susan Hamilton during the Friend of the Court meeting, where Susan Hamilton attempted to force Deborah into an agreement to Deborah, detriment through threats and intimidation, amounted to a grievous act of misconduct and a clear indications she cannot now, and should not have ever held the position of receiver; as well as Susan Hamilton’s previous recommendation made on November 14, 2008 to Mr. Samuel J. Skousen and Deborah , Ms. Hamilton recommended Deborah be removed from the home, and the home sold un-repaired, leaving Deborah homeless. The home being sold un-repaired was the desire of Janice Eduis Nielson Skousen, Mr. Samuel J. Skousen’s second wife, as documented in a 2006 e-mail, regarding Janice Eduis Nielson Skousen wanting the home at 4175 Summer Hill, Brighton Michigan for her brother.

In Mr. Samuel Skousen own statements he has stated, that Ms. Sue Hamilton was his hammer against Deborah to make alimony concessions, Mr. Skousen statements, furthers the predetermined role of Ms. Hamilton as a detrimental and damaging force in Mr. Samuel J. Skousen’s current court actions. Deborah is demanding Sue Hamilton’s immediate removal, she cannot continue in her role as receiver, as it is increasingly raising questions of improperly on the FOC and court part.


Concern is also raised, regarding Livingston County courts, due to the influence of Livingston County Judge Susan Geddis and William McCririe a Prosecutor in the Livingston County Court system, due to their involvement in the malicious prosecution of Deborah , as well as the Geddis/ McCririe continued role in the divorce case, as attempts were made by Attorney David L. Morris, Samuel J. Skousen, Edwin Literski and Richard Trost, to conceal the family relationship of the Gaddis/ McCririe and sell the home undervalued, thorough the brother in law of Judge Susan Geddes, Garry McCririe, a real estate broker, prior to the closed door agreement between Mr. Samuel J. Skousen and Attorney Richard Trost. Gary McCririe is now Genoa Twp. Supervisor. Genoa Twp. is the township where Deborah currently resides and where the marital home is located.
Documentation will be brought to hearing.


__________________________
Deborah
June 24, 2009

For other reasons why the county has abused her and her kids, cut and paste:

Bizzy blog from a conservative blogger: The Case against Mitt Romney his risky associations and entanglements

http://www.bizzyblog.com/2008/07/22/the-case-against-mitt-romney-his-risky-associations-and-entanglements/

and the blog "STRANGE BEDFELLOWS"

http://janskousenandromney.blogspot.com/

Steven Jentzen and Livingston County Michigan Courts

Mr. Steven Jentzen sent in the mail a notice for a Motion To Withdraw he put into Court on April 3, 2009 ( I think the date is Mr. Skousens birthday). The hearing is scheduled for April 23, 2009 before Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola.

Mr. Steven Jentzen sent his e-mail on March 9,2009 notifying he withdrew on March 7, 2009 from the case. I was forced into the March 20, 2009 FOC hearing without an attorney, because Mr. Jentzen had not ‘officially withdrawn’

The withdrawal sent to me by Mr. Steven Jentzen read as follows: The withdrawal Mr. Steven Jentzen wrote up himself:

STATE OF MICHIGAN

IN THE FAMILY COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON


DEBORAH ,
Case No. -DM
Plaintiff,
Judge: Carol Hackettt Garagiola
V Referee: Gerald A. Eidt

SAMUEL J. SKOUSEN,

Defendant.
___________________________________/

STEVEN M. JENTZEN, P.C.
Steven M. Jentzen P29391
Attorney for Plaintiff
106 South Washington Street
Ypsilanti , MI 48197
(734) 482-5466
(734) 482-2440 Fax
__________________________________/

CONSENT ORDER TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF, DEBORAH

At a session of said Court,
City of Howell , Livingston County , Michigan ,
this _____ day of March, 2009.

PRESENT: HON____________________________ Circuit Court Judge

Plaintiff, Deborah , having stipulated hereto, and the court being duly advised in the premises; NOW THEREFORE,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Steven M. Jentzen, P.C., may withdraw as attorney of record for Plaintiff Deborah ., and that said withdrawal will be effective on the 7th day of March, 2009.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall retain other counsel who shall forthwith enter an appearance, or notify the court she intends to proceed in pro per, on or before March 14th, 2009.

Circuit Court Judge

Approved as to form and substance:

___________________________ _____________________________
Steven M. Jentzen P29392 Deborah, Plaintiff
Attorney for Plaintiff

I could not sign Mr. Steven Jentzen withdrawal, with his ‘further ordered’ put into his withdrawal -- I felt set up.
What Constitutional rights does Mr. Steven Jentzen believe in? Here four days lady to find and attorney, note a weekend is put into his “It is further Ordered”.

By March 19, 2009 I wrote to him stating

Dear Mr. Jentzen,

You are no longer my attorney and withdrew as of March 9, 2009. Your have not discussed my case with me, since my initial contact with you, you did not show up to a scheduled hearing in October 2008, or notify me of the hearing, and withdrew as of March 9, 2009 and you will not be paid. I cannot trust you to represent the interest of myself or family.

Sincerely,

Deborah
-----------------------
Another Withdrawal of Attorney form was returned to Mr. Steven Jentzen by me for Mr. Jentzen to sign, leaving off his "It is further order"; guess, he could not sign that one.

Mr. Steven Jentzen must not have understood he was 'fired' as of March 19, 2009.

on April 8. 2009 a second letter went out to Mr. Steven Jentzen which reads as follows:

Dear Mr Jentzen,

Your services have been terminated. You notified me on March 9, 2009 you were withdrawing from the case. As of the end of March your services were terminated. Your failed to sign the withdrawal form I sent to you, leaving out the stipulation I find an attorney within a few days time period for the FOC hearing, or go Pro Per......

Your failure to properly represent, failure to notify of the October hearing, a lack of attorney representation you are discharged. You have shown on conscience regarding your conduct.


Deborah

Next Hearing April 16, 2009

Judge Reader is hearing the disqualification Judge Carol Hackett Garagiola again, on April 16, 2009 at 8:30 a.m.. A notice was sent out yesterday on April 3, 2009, a day after I was before Judge Reader on Thursday, April 2,2009.

This is even after the notice of the actions in Appeals Court was put into record a awhile in Livingston County-- giving Livingston County Court two copies of the appeals.

Judge Reader was given another copy of the appeals on April 2, 2009 during the court hearing.